Gendering Work from Home: An Analysis of the Visible and Invisible Women Workforce in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Phrases like ‘remote work’ or ‘work from home’ are primarily found in conjunction with the pandemic-induced ‘new normal’. It is generally assumed that the origin of the work-from-home employment relationship lies solely in the pandemic. However, when evaluated from a gendered perspective, work from home emerges as neither a novelty nor a temporary make-shift stint to facilitate social distancing protocols. For women, the concept of home as a workstation has been a long-standing patriarchal reality.

It is generally assumed that the origin of the work-from-home employment relationship lies solely in the pandemic. The realities of employment and working conditions differ for women employed in the formal sector from those engaged in the informal sector as well as along the intersections of social categories of race, caste, and class. However, the aforementioned idea of domestic space as a site of labour is a constant for most women regardless of their employment status. Given the overarching patriarchal family structure, women are expected to undertake unpaid labour1 within the household than men. Women make up 60% of unpaid family workers and 98% of domestic workers (Mehta 2000: 27).

Traditionally, for women employed in the formal work sector , a clear distinction has existed between the remunerated work performed in a public setting and the unremunerated work in the private or household sphere. For women engaged in informal work, namely domestic work, work on family subsistence farms, care work, etc., home is often the site for both remunerated and unremunerated work.

The perception of space as something private or public alongside the nature of activities performed, whether remunerated or unremunerated, creates different employment expectations for women and men. The pandemic and the resulting containment protocols have worsened this divide. While women employed in the formal sector are witnessing a blurring of boundaries between paid and unpaid work responsibilities, those working in the informal sector are witnessing a loss of employment altogether. This article aims to explore this divide in the context of both formal and informal women workers and highlight the need for policy intervention to bridge the resulting gaps.


Default Author Image

Avishi Gupta

Found this post insightful? Share it with your network and help spread the knowledge.

Suggested Reads

Integrating Non-Conventional Data Sources for Evidence-Based Policymaking and Better Governance in India 

Data is one of the fundamental pillars of evidence-based decision-making, fostering trust through transparency, which ultimately leads to better governance in a country. While developed economies have already established a robust national statistical ecosystem to ensure a steady flow of data within their countries, developing nations still struggle to generate even the most basic statistical […]

State of Mind: The ‘Lunatic’ in Prisons 

The prevalence of mental illness in prison settings is significantly higher than in the general population—approximately 3-6 times higher, as available evidence indicates (Andersen, 2004; Fazel & Danesh, 2002; Lamb & Weinberger, 1998; Taylor, 2010; Wilper et al., 2009). Substance use disorders (alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, opioid, cocaine, benzodiazepines and other drugs) are the most frequently […]

The Use of Psychological Risk Assessment Tools in Sentencing

Introduction In criminal justice systems around the world, the question of “How dangerous is this person?” often shapes the outcome of sentencing and parole decisions. While several countries have turned to structured psychological tools such as the Historical-Clinical-Risk-20 (HCR-20) and Static-99 to bring transparency and consistency to these high-stakes judgments, India continues to rely almost […]