Did the PLI Reap what it Sowed? An Intermediate Case Study of the Textile Sector

Introduction

As India grapples with leveraging its manufacturing prowess to fuel its growth story with challenges emerging on the fronts of international trade, a closing demographic window, concerns of premature deindustrialization, etc., an analysis of what has been called as her de facto Industrial Policy—Production Linked Incentives, announced in 2020—becomes imperative (Dhar, 2024). Launched to meet a host of objectives, such as reducing import dependencies and promotion of exports, anchoring of global supply chain champions and augment domestic value addition, create employment and scale productive capacities, the PLI scheme covers 14 strategic manufacturing sectors, namely (PMO, 2021; Sitharaman, 2021; PIB, 2024):

  1. Large Scale Electronics Manufacturing (LSEM)
  2. Critical Key Starting Materials (KSMs)/ Drug Intermediaries (Dis) and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs)
  3. Manufacturing of Medical Devices
  4. Automobiles and Auto Components
  5. Pharmaceutical Drugs
  6. Specialty Steel
  7. Telecom and Networking Products
  8. IT Hardware
  9. White Goods (Air Conditioners and LEDs)
  10. Food Products
  11. Textile Products: MMF Segment & Technical Textiles
  12. High Efficiency Solar PV Modules
  13. Advanced Chemistry Cell Batteries
  14. Drone and its Components

Das, D. K., & Kalita, G. (2009). Do Labor Intensive Industries Generate Employment? Evidence from FIrm Level Survey in India (Working Paper, 237). New Delhi: ICRIER.

Dhar, B. (2024, January 10). PLI: On the Way to Another Failed Incentive Scheme? The India Forum.

ET Bureau. (2024, June 26). PLI Worth Rs. 10,000 Crore Approved for Textiles: Minister Giriraj Singh. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/garments-/-textiles/pli-worth-rs-10000-crore-approved-for-textiles-minister-giriraj-singh/articleshow/111267394.cms

Garg, A. (2020). Production Linked Incentive in Mobile Manufacturing in India. Aayam, 10 (2), 1-8.

Ghosh, J., & Chandrashekhar, C. (2023, June 13). On the FDI Route to Manufacturing Success. https://www.networkideas.org/featured-articles/2023/06/on-the-fdi-route-to-manufacturing-success/

Goswami, A. G., Medvedev, D., & Olafsen, E. (2019). High-Growth Firms: Facts, Fiction, and Policy Options for Emerging Economies. Washington: World Bank Group.

Indian Trade Portal. (n.d.). Export Promotion Schemes. https://indiantradeportal.in/vs.jsp?lang=0&id=0,25,857,3901

Joseph, R., & Kumar, R. (2022). Reducing Import Dependence on APIs in the Indian Pharmaceuticals Sector: An Analysis of the Early Experience of the PLI Phase 1 Scheme. ISID Working Paper, 239.

Kant, A., & Patil, Y. (2021, April 10). Battling the Barrier of Scale. https://www.niti.gov.in/battling-barrier-scale

Kapoor, A., Puri, P., Kartik, Joshi, N., & Zutshi, S. (2024). Assessment of PLI Scheme on EV Manufacturing in India. Gurgaon: Institute for Competitiveness (The India Dialog Working Paper Series, 2024/27).

KPMG & FICCI. (2023, Feb). India 2047: Vision and Strategic Roadmap for Technical Textiles. https://texmin.gov.in/sites/default/files/India%202047_Vision%20%26%20Strategic%20Roadmap%20for%20Technical%20Textiles%20in%20India_KPMG.pdf

Martin, L. A., Nataraj, S., & Harrison, A. (2017). In with the Big, Out with the Small: Removing Small-Scale Reservations in India. American Economic Review, 107 (2), 354-386.

Min. of Textiles. (2025, January 2). India’s share of global trade in textiles and apparel stands at 3.9%. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2089508

Min. of Textiles and DPIIT. (March, 2025). Unstarred Question no. 4022: PLI Scheme in the Manufacturing Sector. sansad.in.

Minister of Textiles. (Aug, 2025). Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2566: Allocation of Funds to PLI Scheme. New Delhi: sansad.in.

Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2025, April 1). Threads of Progress. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2117470

Ministry of Commerce and Industry; DPIIT. (July, 2025). Unstarred Question (LS) 458: Objectives of PLI Scheme. New Delhi: sansad.in.

Ministry of Finance, GoI. (2025). Expenditure Budget, 2025-26. New Delhi: GoI.

Ministry of Textiles. (2021). Operational Guidelines for Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Textiles for Promoting MMF and TT Segments (File no. 12015/03/2020-IT). Ministry of Textiles, GoI.

Ministry of Textiles. (2021, September 21). Production Linked Incentive Scheme for Textiles (F. No. 12015/03/2020-IT. https://pli.texmin.gov.in/frontend/images/Documents/1.%20PLI%20Textiles%20Notification_24.09.2021.pdf

Ministry of Textiles. (2025, August 8). Re-opening of PLI Scheme for Textiles for MMF apparel, MMF Fabrics and products of Technical Textiles for inviting fresh applications. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2154114

Ministry of Textiles. (n.d.). Annex 1: Indian Man-Made Fiber Textile Industry. https://ministryoftextiles.gov.in/sites/default/files/Indian%20Manmade%20fibre%20textile%20industry.pdf

Ministry of Textiles. (August 2025 (Date Accessed) ). PLI Dashboard. https://pli.texmin.gov.in/home-dashboard

Ministry of Textiles, GoI. (2021, Feb 5). Employment in the Textile Industry. https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1695528

Mishra, Y. (Forthcoming, 2025). Between Strikes and Precarity: Productivity as a Terrain of Workers Agency. Retrieved from sprf.in.

MoSPI. (2024). Annual Survey of Industries, 2022-23, vol. 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yBqWw4oMC_IbkenNnn6l2MsLgp8p6wXae54kNJhogMk/edit?tab=t.0: MoSPI, GoI.

Nathan, D. (2021). From Monopoly to Monospony Capitalism. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 64, 843-866.

NSSO, MoSPI. (2024). Annual Survey of Unincorporated Sector Enterprises (ASUSE), 2022-23: Operational and Economic Characteristics. MoSPI, GoI.

PIB. (2024, Nov 25). PLI Schemes: Shaping India’s Industrial Growth. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=153454

PMO. (2021, March 5). PM Addresses Webinar on Production Linked Incentives Scheme. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1702640

Raju, S., & Sharma, C. (2024). Making Production Linked Incentive Scheme Work: Assessing Priorities. EPW, 29 (34).

Saraswathy, B. (2025). The First PLI Experience in Indian Steel Sector: Efficacy and Challenges. Mineral Economics, 38, 485-90.

Simones, A., & Hidalgo, C. (2011). The Economic Complexity Observatory: An Analytical Tool for Understanding the Dynamics of Economic Development. https://oec.world/en/resources/about: Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Sitharaman, N. (2021, Feb 1). Speech, Budget 2021-22. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2021-22/doc/Budget_Speech.pdf

Vora, A., Gupta, A., Ojha, A., Pandey, P., Marwaha, S., Kadam, S., & Singh, S. (2021). India’s Pharma and Medical Devices Strategies: An Assessment of the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme. IJIRR, 8 (3), 7208-7219.

 

 

 

Endnotes

[1] As per the HS 2 Digit Codes which are extrapolated from the reserved commodities under the PLI scheme for textiles (Ministry of Textiles, 2021).

[2] This section has been condensed from (Ministry of Textiles, 2021).

[3] Some experts have also raised questions on whether this definition of value addition is an adequate one based on net sales. See, for example, (Raju & Sharma, 2024).

[4] The case of Tamil Nadu for which we have more exact figures allows us further precision in our argument. Two points to be noted are that one can, with reason, assume that per project 1 manufacturing unit will be established since the total applications approved for Tamil Nadu are 10 and the total manufacturing units established under PLI in the state are 11. Then, the total person engaged in these 11 units are at 5,295 currently (which might increase), which, again, supersedes the national average of per factory person engaged. (Ministry of Textiles, August 2025 (Date Accessed) ) (Ministry of Commerce and Industry; DPIIT, July, 2025).

[5] A phenomenon which may be celebrated by those who adhere to a laissez faire ideology (Goswami, Medvedev, & Olafsen, 2019).

Yugank Mishra

Yugank holds an M.Phil. in Modern Indian History from Dr B.R. Ambedkar University, Delhi, specialising in 19th-century subaltern histories. He has worked in research and programs-centric roles with some of the leading stakeholders in the social development sector such as the Indian Council for Social Sciences Research, Bureau of Police Research and Development (Ministry of Home Affairs, GoI), National Human Rights Council, Azim Premji Foundation, Asia Floor Wage Alliance, Ajeevika Bureau, amongst others. He has experience in organisational development and leading partnerships, and in his latest stint at the Society for Labour and Development, he led the first iteration of their novel labour rights and support fellowship across India.
Found this post insightful? Share it with your network and help spread the knowledge.

Suggested Reads

Integrating Non-Conventional Data Sources for Evidence-Based Policymaking and Better Governance in India 

Data is one of the fundamental pillars of evidence-based decision-making, fostering trust through transparency, which ultimately leads to better governance in a country. While developed economies have already established a robust national statistical ecosystem to ensure a steady flow of data within their countries, developing nations still struggle to generate even the most basic statistical […]

State of Mind: The ‘Lunatic’ in Prisons 

The prevalence of mental illness in prison settings is significantly higher than in the general population—approximately 3-6 times higher, as available evidence indicates (Andersen, 2004; Fazel & Danesh, 2002; Lamb & Weinberger, 1998; Taylor, 2010; Wilper et al., 2009). Substance use disorders (alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, opioid, cocaine, benzodiazepines and other drugs) are the most frequently […]