Regularising Qualifications within the Mental Health Industry

 

Abstract: The MHA 2017 was a long time coming and a necessary revamp of the Indian State’s engagement with the mental health infrastructure of India. The Act makes claims of ensuring patient-centric affordable health care. This piece would specially advocate for a policy mechanism which recognises a larger ambit of mental healthcare practitioners to create engagement with the mental health infrastructure of the country. The paper employs stakeholder interviews to substantiate claims and offer possible policy changes. 
Understanding the Mental Healthcare Spectrum
Mental Health Act [MHA], 2017 came into effect in May 2018 and repealed the Mental Health Act, 1987. This act was lauded for being patient-centric and ensuring that mental healthcare services were “available, affordable and accessible” (Mishra, A. & Galhotra, A. 2018). The act helps the Indian mental health legislation meet 68% of the WHO checklist for the given mental health legislation (Duffy, R. M. & Kelly, B. D., 2020). While the Mental Health Act 2017 (MHA, 2017) was a long time coming, and its decriminalisation of suicide was some critical improvements, this paper focuses on the patient-centric understanding of the bill. 
The mental health spectrum is wide, requiring a policy understanding differentiating between mental health illness and mental healthcare. Mental health illness is diagnosed through clinical tests and has a clear prognosis involving medication and therapy but is not limited to the same. On the other hand, mental health care is the realisation of the need for life and mental health adjustment to better deal with ongoing stressors. However, it is critical to understand how the Indian Mental Health Act engages and fails to recognise regularising the myriad qualifications of mental health practitioners. 
At present, education institutions in India train mental health practitioners for mental illness (psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, nurses) and mental health care (psychologists, counsellors, therapists, to name a few). Yet, no law currently recognises the ample ambit of mental healthcare practitioners. The MHA, 2017 only recognises clinical psychologists and psychiatrists as mental health practitioners, which only encompasses mental health infrastructure for mental illness. 
There is a mismatch between education being provided and recognised practitioners by law within the field. This mismatch results in tangible costs for the industry, where many practitioners are actively involved in healthcare practice and have no regulation on their ambit and scope. Qualifications within mental healthcare practitioners are important because their education defines the scope of their ability as a practitioner. This vulnerability and lack of clear policy structure create conditions where the mental healthcare system is informal, and the ambiguity has tangible health and economic costs for patients.

 


Default Author Image

Sakshi Sharda

Found this post insightful? Share it with your network and help spread the knowledge.

Suggested Reads

India’s and Other Emerging Carbon Markets in the Developing World

Abstract Exactly 28 years ago, with the Kyoto Protocol; a result of the Earth Summit held at Rio De Janeiro in Brazil, carbon markets came into existence to address climate change, and it established the foundation for carbon markets by introducing market-based mechanisms like emissions trading. Carbon markets allow countries to trade emission reduction credits, […]

Urban Utopias, Ecological Dystopias: The Yamuna Riverfront and Its Discontents

In 2019, the NGT banned all farming activities on the Yamuna floodplains following a study by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute that found high levels of lead in vegetables and corresponding soil samples. Environmentalists are increasingly suggesting that farming does not threaten the region’s ecology, especially with the controlled use of fertilisers and pesticides

Workers or Owners? The Case of Women Farmers in India

Introduction Marginalization of women, seen through the case of exclusion from ownership structures, can be considered as one of the key reasons against which the suffrage movement was initially mounted, globally. However, in India and abroad, with the delinkages between citizenship rights and property holdings by the mid-twentieth century, the question of land rights and […]

बुलडोजर से अन्याय

आपराधिक मामलों के अभियुक्तों के मकान पर बुलडोजर चलाने की कार्रवाई ने देश के कानून के सामने नई चुनौती पेश की है। कानूनी प्रक्रिया का पालन किए बिना किसी की छत को कैसे ढहाया जा सकता है? अभियुक्त तो दूर यदि किसी को मुकदमे के बाद दोषी भी पाया गया है, तो क्या उसके मकान […]