Transcending the ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ Approach in Law-Making: Twin Conditions Restricting Bail

By Nitika Khaitan

July 4, 2022
Download article

ABSTRACT

When confronted with complex challenges of law and order, governance, or social reform, Indian lawmakers routinely resort to enacting statutory provisions copied verbatim from previous laws. For example, the provision that imposes harsh conditions on bail is the same for the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1985 [NDPS Act], the Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 1940, and the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972. Lawmakers have exacted the provision despite the laws being diverse, both in subject area and time period.

The provision has sparked intense legal debate, given its constitutional ramifications and implications on personal liberty. It has been widely criticised for making pre- or under-trial bail near impossible, especially when over two-thirds of the prison population comprises those under trial. However, an interdisciplinary and comprehensive policy perspective is missing from the discourse. Most such analyses tend to focus only on one specific law, ignoring the effect of the same provision’s presence in multiple laws. 

The paper aims to explain the legal criticism of this provision and its impact on personal freedom and rights while also examining the stated legislative intentions of introducing it into various laws.

Keywords: Bail, Criminal Justice, Legal Reform, Parliamentary Debates   

INTRODUCTION

Indian headlines are dominated by news of high-profile bail cases that read ‘Supreme Court junks bail plea in PMLA case,’ or ‘SC grants bail to UAPA undertrial in custody for 8 years, observing trial will take a long time.’ Most such high-profile cases share a striking similarity: a near-identical and verbatim set of restrictions on bail. Such restrictions that govern these cases are reproduced across laws which criminalise offences ranging from drug possession to terrorist activity. These conditions also make release on bail extremely difficult, if not impossible, for undertrials. The circumstances, therefore, raise serious constitutional and human rights concerns, besides the question of what justifies the lengthy imprisonment of a person who has not yet been found guilty. 


Default Author Image

Nitika Khaitan

Found this post insightful? Share it with your network and help spread the knowledge.

Suggested Reads

Climate-Induced Internal Migration for Domestic Work in India: Gendered Pathways, Regional Dynamics, and Policy Responses

By Tanvi Saxena

Abstract In India, internal migration for domestic work has emerged as a major form of feminised labour mobility, closely linked to the burgeoning impacts of climate change in affected areas, social marginalisation, and rural agrarian crises. The evidence from cyclone-affected coasts of West Bengal, floodplains of Assam, tribal tracts of Jharkhand, drought-affected Bundelkhand, and climate-affected […]

From TADA to PRAHAAR: Evolution of Counter-Terrorism Law and Policy in India

By Anusha Arif

Framing India’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy Terrorism has been an unfortunate reality in India for several decades. In India’s independent history, the country faced several threats from internal and external terrorism groups, claiming several lives. The leadership of India has strongly opposed and drafted laws against terrorism over the decades to confront these unprompted instances of violence. […]

Integrating Non-Conventional Data Sources for Evidence-Based Policymaking and Better Governance in India 

By Pankaj Chowdhury

Data is one of the fundamental pillars of evidence-based decision-making, fostering trust through transparency, which ultimately leads to better governance in a country. While developed economies have already established a robust national statistical ecosystem to ensure a steady flow of data within their countries, developing nations still struggle to generate even the most basic statistical […]