The Juvenile Justice System in India: A Brief Overview

ABSTRACT 

The Indian legal system has long established a rehabilitative response to juvenile crimes. However, with the passing of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015, a shift was made towards a  more punitive approach for effectively curbing juvenile crimes. The 2015 Act allowed for children between the ages of 16 to 18 years to be tried as adults, albeit only in cases of heinous crimes. This issue brief discusses the motivations of the Indian political and legal systems behind affecting such a shift and the merit, if any, of moving away from a reformative approach when dealing with children in conflict with the law. 

BACKGROUND 

Under the legal framework governing justice for juveniles in India, a juvenile or a child is defined as any person who is below the age of 18 years. Prior to the passing of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, such a child, when in conflict with law1, regardless of the nature of offence committed was required to spend a maximum of three years in institutional care. Such a child could not be given a penalty higher than three years, or be imprisoned. When the 2015 Act replaced the Juvenile  Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and came into force on January 15, 2016, it allowed for juveniles in the age group of 16 to 18 years involved in cases of heinous crimes2, to be tried as adults. 

The 2015 Act required that Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs) be set up in every district of the country to conduct preliminary inquiries in cases of juvenile crimes, with the aim of determining the physical and mental capacity of such a child as well as his or her ability to comprehend the consequences of the offence committed. This marked a clear departure from treating a child as doli incapax: someone who is incapable of realizing the consequences of his or her actions. 

After the completion of the inquiry, the Board can decide to transfer the case to a Children’s Court for trial. If found guilty during the trial, the child is to be sent to a place of safety4 for reformation and rehabilitation till he or she attains 21 years of age. Upon turning 21, an evaluation of such a child is to be conducted by the Children’s Court. If the child is determined to be reformed, he or she can be released on probation. If not, the child is transferred to an adult jail and serves the rest of the term of imprisonment,  determined in accordance with the offence committed. 


Default Author Image

Teena Thomas

Found this post insightful? Share it with your network and help spread the knowledge.

Suggested Reads

Impact of the Agnipath Scheme on Indo-Nepal Relations, China’s Involvement, and Way Forward for India

Introduction The relations between South Asian countries are laden with historical complexities and shifting strategic concerns. India’s Agnipath scheme is a drastic change in military recruitment policy on the domestic and international levels. In this article, we will analyse the effects of the Agnipath scheme on Indo-Nepal relations, discuss the change in Nepal’s inclination towards […]

Gender Budgeting and Electoral Politics in India: From Welfare to Empowerment

Introduction Gender-responsive budgeting (GRB) has emerged as a vital tool in addressing gender disparities, by embedding gender considerations into fiscal policies and transforming resource allocation for women-centric programs. Introduced in India in 2005-06, GRB marked a shift from the “Women in Development” approach to a broader “Gender and Development” perspective. The National Institute of Public […]

Social Media As An Emerging Theatre Of Fierce Political Contest: Insights From The 2024 Indian General Elections

The 2024 Indian general elections was the largest, and consequently, the most expensive election ever held, in the world. Notably, social media emerged as a dominant theatre of political campaigning, with parties spending large amounts of money on advertising, on platforms such as Meta, and on running Google advertising campaigns. However, the large-scale embrace of […]

सीआरपीसी के तहत मुस्लिम महिलाएं भी भरण-पोषण की हकदार 

विवेक वार्ष्णेय सुप्रीम कोर्ट के मुस्लिम महिलाओं की गरिमा और समाज में उन्हें बराबरी का दर्जा का देने के लिए एक अहम फैसला दिया है। सीआरपीसी की धारा 125 के तहत मुस्लिम महिलाएं भी गुजारा-भत्ता पाने की हकदार है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने स्पष्ट किया कि मुस्लिम महिलाओं के लिए 1986 में लाया गया कानून उन्हें […]

Towards Enhanced Security: Proposing a Himalayan Guard for India

The region shares borders with Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK), China and Aksai Chin, Tibet, Nepal, Myanmar, and Bangladesh. Several of these neighbours, notably Pakistan and China, have caused conflicts in India. Additionally, border tensions with Myanmar and sporadic conflicts with Bangladesh have further highlighted the strategic importance of the Himalayas.